Blog

Bag the Sports Hero Worship, Support The SFC

No Comments 28 February 2010

tiger-woods-press-conference-apologyWhen the Tiger Woods scandal broke, many were shocked while some were unfazed by the news that another hero had fallen from grace. Woods, the first billion-dollar athlete, had chiseled out of gold his pristine image for sponsors and fans to embrace wholeheartedly.

Charles Barkley once famously asked the question, ”A million guys can dunk a basketball in jail; should they be role models?”. Shortly thereafter in 1993, he wrote the text for his “I am not a role model” Nike commercial which garnered national media attention. The concept rings true although society will always idolize successful athletes. USA Today found that close to 66% of fans say athletes will influence kids more in the years to come.

It all seems rather inevitable. Sports Marketing companies like Octagon help their clients (both leagues and superstars) sell sports to fans. These organizations target our sports fan dollars with whatever means is available to them.

SFC argues that the real heroes are the fans. Those who speak up against the powers that be to make it better for their fellow sports fans. Tiger Woods sold out a long time ago, but more recently his actions have disappointed his fans to the extent that even Gatorade has dropped him. While it would be nice to believe that professional athletes are professional off the field and heroes on the field are worth that hero worship when they shed their sweaty jerseys and throw them into the crowd, it’s just not worth it.

Rather, it’s worth our time and energy supporting our own collective cause. Our cause is holding our representatives and favorite teams accountable for their actions. If they take tax money, we should be able to find affordable seats in stadiums, we should be able watch the game on TV, and we should see the college champion decided on the field. Nothing less.  That’s worth our attention and support.

Blog, Issues, Where Are My Games?

Sports Fans Coalition Makes Waves in Portland

1 Comment 26 February 2010

Blazers_UpriseSign_2009In the span of 24 hours, SFC board member Brad Blakeman represented sports fans in Oregon and across the country by going on the radio, speaking to TV and newspaper reporters, and most importantly, by testifying in the Oregon General Assembly hearing targeting the Portland Trail Blazers’ deal with Comcast which shuts out so many fans from the team’s broadcasts.

Watch the video of Brad’s testimony:

Comcast promised to provide competitors access to games so that the areas where Comcast is not available in Oregon, fans would still be able to watch their games.  Furthermore, the FCC has ruled that it is not lawful to maintain local sports exclusives.  In other words, even where Comcast is available, they need to share the games with competitors so consumers have the choice of carriers.  Almost 3 years ago, this deal was struck, the promise was made, and the fans are still left out in the cold without access to their Blazers games.

The media recognizes that the activist state that is Oregon will not settle for this mistreatment.  Blakeman’s testimony was mentioned in Willamette Week Online, The Oregonian, KPTV, The Oregon Politico, and BlazersEdge.com.  His interviews on The Lars Larson Show and on The Game 95.5 helped spread the word to current and future members of the new Local Chapter SFC-Portland.

SFC has built the avenue to channel the frustration of so many Blazers fans who are signing the petition asking the state legislature, ‘Where Are My Blazers Games?‘  Sports Fans in Oregon are taking action deciding to JOIN THE COALITION, to become a fan of SFC Portland on Facebook, and to follow the local chapter on Twitter.

We need to keep the pressure on Comcast, the team, and the state representatives to make this right.  We Want Our Games!

Petitions, Where Are My Blazers Games?

Where Are My Blazers Games?

No Comments 25 February 2010

Sports Fans Coalition has launched the Local Chapter SFC-Portland in order to organize and mobilize those frustrated Trail Blazers fans who continue to be shut out from being able to watch their home team play home games on TV unless they pay Comcast’s ransom. Furthermore, many sports fans in Oregon do not have Comcast in their area, and therefore, can not watch their team play.

Blog, Issues, Where Are My Games?

SFC Board Member Brad Blakeman’s Testimony Before Oregon General Assembly

2 Comments 24 February 2010

Testimony of Brad Blakeman

Sports Fans Coalition

before the

Oregon State House Committee on
Consumer Protection and Government Accountability

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

 

Chairman Holvey, Vice-Chairman Gilliam, Vice-Chairman Riley, Members of the Consumer Protection and Government Accountability Committee: 

 

The question that brings me before you is a simple one:  should Oregon sports fans be able to watch on TV their home town team play home games in the comfort of their homes or at their favorite restaurant or bar?  When the taxpayers of Oregon help to make sports here a reality, the answer is clearly, yes they should!   

 

My name is Brad Blakeman and I am a member of the Sports Fans Coalition Board of Directors.  Like a lot of Oregonians, I am an avid sports fan.  I also have lived and breathed politics and public policy for decades, serving on the senior White House staff for President George W. Bush and, today, teaching political science at Georgetown University.  I also am a regular political contributor to Fox News, MSNBC, and other television networks.

 

Sports Fans Coalition is a non-profit advocacy group with a single mission:  to give the sports fan a seat at the table whenever public policy impacting sports is being made.  We have a bi-partisan board of directors.  In addition to myself, a Republican from the Bush White House, our Chairman, David Goodfriend, is a Democrat and former Clinton White House staffer.  Our board also includes a sports writer, a public interest advocate, and a former CEO.  Our members are sports fans from around the United States.  But we all have one thing in common:  we love sports and think that fans should be better represented before the government.

 

We are proud to announce that just this week, Sarah Moon of Portland became the Chair of Sports Fans Coalition’s new Portland, Oregon chapter.  Sarah is a die-hard Trail Blazers fan, season-ticket holder, and all-around Oregon sports fan.

 

Here in Oregon, Portland Trail Blazers fans have been shut out from watching their own games.  In 2007, the Trail Blazers apparently entered into a ten-year deal with Comcast, worth about $120 million, to carry Trail Blazers games on Comcast SportsNet.  At the time, fans in Oregon were told that they eventually would be able to view their home games regardless of who provided their TV. 

 

Oregon sports fans rightfully expected to be able to watch their Trail Blazers playing home games in Portland.  After all, the fans helped pay for the arena.  Press accounts state that the City of Portland contributed $34.5 million to help build the Rose Garden. 

 

Today, however, almost three years after the Comcast/Blazers deal, only Comcast cable subscribers and a few subscribers to small cable systems can watch every game the Blazers play at home.  This year, for example, of the over 80 home games, 60 will be available only to Comcast and a few other subscribers via Comcast Sports Net.

 

So, if you live in a neighborhood that is served by Charter cable, you cannot watch your Trail Blazers playing a home game.  If you live in a rural area where the only pay-TV providers are DISH Network or DIRECTV, you cannot watch your Trail Blazers playing a home game. 

 

Even the mother of Sarah Moon, our Oregon chapter chair, is impacted:  a huge Trail Blazers fan, she lives in a rural area south of Portland.  She does not have access to Comcast, which means she has zero access to Blazers games.  As you can imagine, this is extremely disappointing for her.

 

Oregon sports fans, you deserve better.

 

Now, it just so happens that Comcast wants something from you at the moment.

 

On January 28, 2010, Comcast, GE, and NBC-Universal filed papers in Washington, D.C. asking the government to approve Comcast acquiring NBC-Universal. 

 

The federal government is not the only one who can weigh in on this transaction, however.  The State of Oregon, through the office of the Attorney General, can weigh in on the proposed merger under Oregon anti-trust laws.  Oregon could even move to block the deal.

 

In other words, Oregon, Comcast right now is asking you for permission to acquire NBC-Universal.

 

Sports Fans Coalition would like to pose a simple question:  if Comcast is asking the Oregon state government and the federal government for permission to acquire NBC-Universal, why can’t Trail Blazers fans in Oregon ask to see their home games first?

 

Comcast might make a number of arguments against us even posing this question.  For example, they might say that theirs is a private contract negotiated between Comcast and the Trail Blazers. 

 

True, and no one wants to interfere with that contract, especially not a free-market conservative Republican like me.  But right now, Comcast is asking the people of Oregon for something it wants—approval of its merger.  Oregonians have every right to ask Comcast for something they want in return, especially when Comcast apparently promised it to them almost three years ago.

 

Comcast also has been known to bring up DIRECTV’s NFL Sunday Ticket as an example of a sports exclusive that somehow justifies Comcast’s behavior in Oregon and elsewhere.

 

Not so.  In Oregon, local fans are not able to watch, from the comfort of their own home, their home-town team playing home games.  Sunday Ticket is for out-of-market games.  It has nothing to do with watching your home town team playing home games.  Sports  Fans Coalition believes that local fans should be able to watch their local team play its home games, regardless of how a fan gets his or her TV.

 

Finally, let me just point out that there are people who think that sports issues are too frivolous for legislatures to take up.  Sports Fans Coalition disagrees.  The government already is heavily involved in sports.  As I mentioned, government funds were used to build the Rose Garden here in Oregon.  Federal statutes include sweeping exemptions for professional sports leagues.  Clearly, legislatures and governments historically have found sports to be fair game.

 

It is about time that fans get off the bench and take the field to fight for their rights to enjoy America’s favorite pastimes, whether in their homes or at their local stadiums.  When issues have an impact on fans, the fans should be heard.

 

Also, let’s face it.  The sports media economy is one of the largest of all private industry sectors.  It is larger than the U.S. automobile industry.  Sports represents tens of billions of dollars annually to the U.S. economy. 

 

Americans these days want to see their government, at the local, state, and federal levels, give them their money’s worth.  If taxpayer dollars and public laws go into sustaining the sports economy –which they do—then fans and citizens have every right to make their wishes known to their elected officials, and to expect results.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today.

Blog, Issues, Where Are My Games?

SFC to Testify Against Comcast in Oregon, SFC Launches Portland Chapter

1 Comment 24 February 2010

Blazers_UpriseSign_2009FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

 

 

 

State of Oregon Seeks Remedy to Trail Blazers TV Contract

SFC Testifies Against Comcast in Oregon General Assembly

SFC Launches First Local Chapter in Portland, Oregon

Washington, D.C. — At the request of the Oregon State Legislature, Sports Fans Coalition sends board member Brad Blakeman to testify in the Oregon State House Committee on Consumer Protection and Government Accountability concerning Comcast’s egregious practice of shutting out Portland Trail Blazers fans from the ability to watch their home games on TV. While Comcast seeks permission to merge with NBC Universal, Blakeman asks, ‘Why can’t Trail Blazers fans in Oregon ask to see their home games first?’

At the outset of the ten-year contract struck between Comcast and the Portland Trail Blazers, Comcast promised Oregon sports fans that they would eventually get to view their home games regardless of who provided their TV.  “Almost three years after the Comcast/Blazers deal,” Blakeman notes, “only Comcast cable subscribers and a few subscribers to small cable systems can watch every game the Blazers play at home.”

To more adequately address the issues that face sports fans in Oregon, Sports Fans Coalition launches the first Local Chapter today based in Portland.  The Chair of SFC Portland, Sarah Moon, shares the experience of many Trail Blazers fans with friends and family currently shut out of Blazers’ broadcasts much to their discontent.  SFC Portland will serve as a home for sports fans to share their frustrations and as a voice for the local community seeking to organize consumers to speak up and demand results from government and industry.

If a media giant like Comcast acts in such a way as to provoke an entire state of sports fans today with such disingenuous behavior, it is evident that preconditions should be applied to the company’s bid to acquire NBC Universal before real consideration is given to approval of the merger.  “Oregon sports fans,” Blakeman continues, “you deserve better.”

The Sports Fans Coalition’s agenda advocates that sports fans should be able to watch their local teams play, regardless of how fans get their games.  There should be no local sports exclusives.  Now that the FCC has voted in favor of the sports fan, the Sports Fans Coalition will be acutely focused on the execution of the ruling in Oregon as well as in every state across the country.

On February 19th, Sports Fans Coalition joined a group of twelve industry associations, labor organizations, and public interest groups in creating and sending a letter urging Comcast President and CEO Brian Roberts to drop litigation seeking to overturn the FCC’s decision to ensure that programming owned by cable operators is shared with competing cable and satellite TV providers so that sports fans are not left out in the cold asking ‘Where are my games?’

Read the letter here.

Sign the petition here.

View the SFC Portland page here.

Become a fan of SFC Portland on Facebook.

Follow SFC Portland on Twitter.

Start an SFC Local Chapter in your town.

Blog, Issues, Where Are My Games?

Comcast/NBC Merger Engagement Could Last a Year

No Comments 23 February 2010

nbc_comcast_logoAccording to The Washington Post, the two current stake holders of NBC Universal, Vivendi SA and General Electric, Co., are playing hardball with respect to the price of shares sold to Comcast in the proposed merger deal. Vivendi which holds a 20% stake in NBC says the current figure is ’several hundred million dollars off. While this news on the surface would appear to be a sign of some relief to consumers and sports fans, it’s really only delaying the inevitable. 

While the big players in the $30 million deal will walk away with smiles on their faces, this level of consolidation will surely bring more pain and suffering to sports fans across the country. As SFC has reported, a merged Comcast NBC giant would flex its muscles as owner of programming, distribution on the local station, and broadband in more than 11 TV markets including New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Boston, Washington, D.C., Houston, Miami, Denver, Hartford and Fresno. 

Furthermore, that list fails to include the harm Comcast currently poses to Trail Blazer fans across the state of Oregon. Fans of Portland’s NBA team are forced to pay Comcast’s ransom to watch their games.  What’s even worse is that entire regions of the state, and locals across state lines in Washington are unable to subscribe to Comcast even if they could afford to do so.

Comcast has claimed repeatedly that they would make the games available to competitors so that all Oregon could watch the games, but at what price? If Comcast is pricing out the competition, what’s the difference between this and a ‘local sports exclusive’ in which the media giant just says, ‘no’?

It’s these types of examples that spawn the action the SFC has taken in petitioning the FCC and joining a coalition, as it did on Friday, to write and send a letter directly to Comcast President and CEO Brian Roberts urging the company to withdraw it’s litigation seeking to overturn the FCC’s pro-sports fan ruling to close the ‘terrestrial loophole’.

At some point, the greed needs to stop. Sports Fans Coalition will not count on these media giants to act in the best interests of sports fans. SFC will not rest on the laurels of a positive decision by the FCC.

A delayed merger approval process does not build confidence in the company to act more socially responsible when business practices and behavior of the past will surely dictate how it will act in the future. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Issues, Where Are My Games?

Sports Fans Coalition Sends Letter Direct to Comcast

4 Comments 22 February 2010

nbc_comcast_logo
Sports Fans Coalition joined a coalition of consumer advocates, labor interests and video service providers urging Comcast President and CEO Brian Roberts to drop litigation that seeks to overturn an FCC regulation he has pledged to follow even if his company prevails in court. Comcast joined Cablevision taking the FCC to court over its decision on a program access requirement designed to ensure that programming owned by cable operators is shared with competing cable and satellite TV providers so that sports fans are not left out in the cold asking ‘Where are my games?’

 

Here is the full text of the letter:

Mr. Brian L. Roberts

Chairman and CEO

Comcast Corporation

1 Comcast Center

Philadelphia, PA 19103

February 19, 2010

 

Dear Mr. Roberts:

The undersigned groups submit this letter in response to your statements in recent congressional hearings on Comcast’s proposed merger with NBC Universal. We take this opportunity to voice concerns regarding Comcast’s commitment to abiding by the Federal Communications Commission’s program access rules.

In litigation pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of  Columbia Circuit, Comcast seeks to eliminate a key component of the program access regime: the ban on exclusive contracts between a cable operator and a satellite-delivered cable programming network in which a cable operator has an ownership interest. In light of Comcast’s participation in this litigation, Sen. Al Franken questioned you on the subject of Comcast’s commitment to abiding by the rules. In response to further questioning during the hearing, you promised that Comcast would adhere to FCC program access rules even if the court declares them to be invalid.

We share Senator Franken’s concerns regarding your pledge. Your assurances are undercut by the fact that your company has a history of opposing the program access rules and is currently trying to dismantle critical parts of the program access regime.

Indeed, one of Comcast’s proposed voluntary merger commitments involves applying FCC program access rules to retransmission consent negotiations with NBC owned-andoperated TV stations only “for as long as the FCC’s current program access rules remain in place.” Conspicuously absent from this promise is any acknowledgment that if Comcast is successful in eliminating the exclusive contract ban in litigation, the “current” program access rules would not apply, and Comcast’s commitment will have vanished before the merger review is even concluded.

Moreover, it is highly unusual that Comcast would continue to spend  shareholder dollars to overturn an FCC regulation that it has promised to follow regardless of the case’s outcome. The fact that Comcast has not withdrawn from the litigation raises questions about whether your company will follow through on this commitment.

Withdrawing from the litigation would neither assuage all of our concerns about Comcast’s past and present actions with regard to the program access rules, nor diminish the need for the Dept. of Justice and FCC to conduct a thorough review of your transaction. It would, however, be an important gesture to bolster the promises you made to Congress on February 4th.

Respectfully,

American Cable Association

Communications Workers of America

Consumer Federation of America

Consumers Union

Free Press

Media Access Project

National Telecommunications Cooperative Association

Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small

Telecommunications Companies

Public Knowledge

Rural Independent Competitive Alliance

Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association

Sports Fans Coalition

 

What was Sen. Franken so mad about? Watch some of the back-and-forth here, and Matthew Lasar provides some excellent play-by-play on Sen. Franken’s line of questioning during the Senate Subcommittee Hearing here:

“I worked for years for NBC,” noted former Saturday Night Live cast member and now Senator Al Franken (D-MN) in his opening remarks. “I really feel I owe a lot to NBC, but what I know from my previous career has given me reason to be concerned… very concerned” about the merger.

Franken recalled that back in the 1980s, the television networks urged the FCC to drop its Financial Interest and Syndication (FYN-SYN) rules, which barred networks from owning all but a small chunk of the programming that they aired—which the agency did. The senator recalled that, at the time, NBC executives promised that relaxing FYN-SYN would not lead the network to favor its own content.

“But by 1992 NBC was the single largest supplier of its own primetime programming,” Franken continued. “Today, if an independent producer wants to get its own show on NBC’s schedule, on any network’s schedule, it is routine practice, and you guys know it, for the network to demand at least part ownership of the show… And that’s just a fact. So while I commend NBCU and Comcast for making voluntary commitments as part of this merger, you’ll have to excuse me if I don’t trust these promises.”

Later on in the hearing, Franken disclosed that Comcast’s Roberts had met with him days earlier, claiming that the FCC’s program carriage rules would protect consumers. “You said that those rules will make sure that you always have a wide variety of programs because they forbid you [NBC] from discriminating against other company’s programs.”

With that, Franken pointed to a large sign board behind him with a quote from Comcast in its recent battle with the NFL Network over which tier on Comcast would carry the sports channel. 

The Commission is simply not equipped or constitutionally empowered to make an independent assessment of the myriad, complex, and dynamic considerations that affect carriage, tiering, and pricing decisions,” said the quote from Comcast attorneys. Thus the First Amendment requires that the Commission exercise extreme caution before interfering with any carriage decision.

“In other words,” Franken continued irately, “looking to get approval for this merger, you sat there in my office and told me to my face that these rules would protect consumers but your lawyers had just finished arguing in front of the Commission that it would be unconstitutional to apply these rules.”

Roberts looked a little offended by Franken’s comments. “When we met, perhaps I was confused. I thought that we were talking about program access, now you are talking about program carriage,” he explained—the latter category deals with where programs will appear on a cable distribution system after they have been granted access.

“Whether it’s program access or program carriage, did you not say that this rule protects the people of Minnesota?” Franken declared, then asked NBC’s Zucker about those FYN-SYN questions. “I think my characterization was pretty accurate, don’t you?”

Zucker paused. “It’s a long time ago and I think there’s a lot of factors that went into back then…”

“C’mon,” Franken interrupted. “You guys said: ‘We’re in the business of ratings! Why would we favor our own programming’?”

“I can tell you what’s happening today,” Zucker pressed on. “NBC has just ordered 20 pilots for new shows…”

“I think what you did was put an NBC-produced show [the now-canceled Jay Leno Show] on at ten o’clock for five nights a week is what I think you did,” Franken retorted.

Blog, Uncategorized

Not Tiger Woods

No Comments 20 February 2010

This story is not about Tiger Woods. Thank goodness.

It is however about brands.  Brands that athletes become.  Brands that use other brands for financial gain yet never divulge revenues to the public. 

While common sense and tangible examples of disappearing investigations (Reggie Bush at USC and Derrick Rose at Memphis) tell us that some college athletes do get paid under the table, it begs the question ‘What’s wrong with this picture?’

Blog, Issues

New NFL Webpage on Labor

No Comments 17 February 2010

nfl-logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Check out the new webpage that the NFL has created to inform the media and public on how the labor talks are going.  (I’ll give you a hint: not good.)

With all of Goodell’s pleading in the days leading up to the Super Bowl in Miami, it was apparent, the league was feeling the heat.

The Sports Fans Coalition will continue to beat the drum, asking ‘What about the sports fans?’ We do not want to see a lockout in 2012.  They need to get a deal done.

So, whether you feel that the information on this site is helpful, biased, or just plain boring, it still might be a good resource for those studying how an organization seeks to totally abuse its position in this country as the number one sport by raking its fans over the coals time and time again shaking every last dime out of our pockets before they come back for more next season.

We shall see if the uncapped year of 2010 will be any different. At this point, it appears that there will be no change. The most important element in all this is that they get a deal done.

Blog, Issues, Stadiums

San Diego Mayor Threatens Dry City with Stadium Plans

No Comments 15 February 2010

newSDstadium02San Diego appears to be the next ‘public funding for stadiums’ victim as Mayor Jerry Sanders promised to use taxpayer monies to build a new  Chargers stadium at the expense of a nagging concern in SoCal: water.  There’s not enough of it, and the situation is getting worse.

waterLeave it to this politician to throw the region’s priorities out of whack. While a brand new, shiny stadium would be fantastic for high-income fans, it is the rule rather than the exception that ticket prices will climb along with parking costs and concessions in the new stadium. And it’s no stretch to claim that new stadiums consistently provide a bad ROI.

It is important to note that many politicians are fighting the good fight across America, but Mayor Sanders has earned the SFC stamp of disapproval with his vows to misuse San Diego residents’ hard-earned cash for a new stadium over the most simple and necessary element to our lives.

Follow this story on our San Diego page, JOIN the Coalition, and if you live in one of the most beautiful towns in the country but still get pissed off about this stuff, start the San Diego chapter of SFC today. We need to stand up and let our representatives know where we stand on the issues to make a difference.




About SFC

SFC is the American sports fan’s advocate in the D.C. public policy arena fighting for sports fans in every city across the country.

Sports Businesses, Leagues, and Universities are grasping for our cash left and right. Let's join together to keep their hands off our wallets unless and until we have a say in how that money is spent. Futhermore, we sports fans believe we should be able to watch our games, no matter how we get our media.

Read More >>

SFC on Twitter